Rome: “Catholics adore the one God, Allah”
Posted on Thursday, May 5, 2011 under polemics and proofs • 4 comments • read it ⇒A quick little argument showing how, on Rome’s own terms, Catholics believe that God’s secret identity is Allah.
The term “catholic” in the Nicene Creed
Posted on Monday, February 7, 2011 under polemics • 1 comment • read it ⇒Four reasons to think that the term “catholic” in the Nicene Creed should not be read as involving communion with the Church of Rome.
Why won’t Randal Rouser answer some simple questions?
Posted on Saturday, January 15, 2011 under polemics • 14 comments • read it ⇒Calling Randal Rauser: why won’t you answer some simple questions?
Where were the Christians before the Reformation?
Posted on Monday, January 10, 2011 under polemics • 14 comments • read it ⇒A response to a Catholic correspondent’s question: “I am genuinely puzzled by your statement that neither the Orthodox nor Catholic Churches are Christian, but false churches … I really would like to know the answer: when were these false churches established? Who were the Christians up to the time of the Reformation?”
What to do when skeptics attack libertarian free will—become a Calvinist
Posted on Thursday, November 18, 2010 under presentations • 7 comments • read it ⇒This is a continuation of the discussion started with Stuart McEwing in his article ‘Openness Theology (Part Two)’, exploring the ramifications of libertarian free will, the principle of alternative possibilities; and how an Arminian theology ultimately collapses into either a Reformed or Open theology, depending on how you push it.
A response to Glenn Peoples’s ‘No, I am not an inerrantist’
Posted on Tuesday, November 17, 2009 under polemics • 8 comments • read it ⇒A response to Glenn Peoples’ article of June 1, in which he critiques the doctrine of biblical inerrancy and finds it wanting.
“No one is righteous”…metaphorically speaking
Posted on Monday, November 9, 2009 under polemics • no comments • read it ⇒A polemic against the argument that, in light of the apparently contradicting evidence of our moral intuitions, total depravity should be interpreted metaphorically.