A response to Glenn Peoples’s ‘No, I am not an inerrantist’
Posted on Tuesday, November 17, 2009 under polemics • 8 comments • read it ⇒A response to Glenn Peoples’ article of June 1, in which he critiques the doctrine of biblical inerrancy and finds it wanting.
“No one is righteous”…metaphorically speaking
Posted on Monday, November 9, 2009 under polemics • no comments • read it ⇒A polemic against the argument that, in light of the apparently contradicting evidence of our moral intuitions, total depravity should be interpreted metaphorically.
Does God exist? Part 4
Posted on Monday, August 6, 2007 under debates • 3 comments • read it ⇒Continued from part 3 «
Click here for Angels Depart’s final statement; below is my response—
As I see it, Angels, there are three main areas which I must cover in this final response so as to show convincingly that God must exist, and that the Bible is his revelation. The first area regards the issue of [...]
Does God exist? Part 3
Posted on Thursday, July 26, 2007 under debates • 5 comments • read it ⇒Continued from part 2 «
Click here for Angels Depart’s third statement; below is my response—
Erratum; August 2, 2007: thank you Jim for pointing out that I incorrectly cited the covenant conditions relating to Judges 1. These are not from Leviticus 7, but Deuteronomy 7.
As with my previous statement, Angels, I am going to respond only [...]