Is intelligent design science? A response to Ken Perrott
Posted on Monday, September 15, 2008 under polemics • no comments • read it ⇒A continuation of my previous commentary on the question of whether intelligent design is a scientific inference. Here, I respond to some objections by kiwi atheist Ken Perrott, pointing out the hypocrisy of secular scientists in labeling the anti-ID thesis as scientific, while denying the same standing for ID itself.
Is intelligent design scientific?
Posted on Friday, September 12, 2008 under pontifications • 3 comments • read it ⇒The question of whether intelligent design is a scientific or philosophical inference is a contentious and oft-debated one. Using a recent discussion on Ken Perrott’s blog as a kick-off point, I offer a brief commentary on this issue, giving reasons for why it is arbitrary to dismiss ID as unscientific.
Education and child abuse
Posted on Saturday, July 26, 2008 under pontifications • 15 comments • read it ⇒A critical response to the accusation that teaching children beliefs which contradict secular science is a form of child abuse. This post is a reply to Ken Perrott’s article ‘”Biblically correct” child abuse?’
On Science, part 4: science and revelation
Posted on Monday, October 1, 2007 under papers • 18 comments • read it ⇒Continued from part 3 «
It is time to affirm the truth of God’s word. Your opponent’s intellectual stronghold has crumbled to dust. His foundational assumptions have been exposed as subjective opinions; his reasoning as irrational; his arguments as speculation; his worldview as fantasy. He has been disarmed, and evicted from his castle of sand; he [...]